Dick Bourke discusses the use of spreadsheets for quality analysis (QA), while highlighting the issues of using the method.
If you work in a contact centre of almost any size, you’re almost certainly familiar with the use of spreadsheets.
Raw data for every department can be captured and converted into useful information for documentation and review.
In addition, with all the spreadsheet templates available, it’s easy to see that they’re popular, easy-to-use and reliable for all business users.
Not so fast. While spreadsheets do serve their purpose – mainly with static data – they’re not well suited for some applications, especially for use in contact centre quality assurance.
Spreadsheets can be cumbersome for the QA manager, slowing internal operations and creating challenges with employee coaching, retention, and engagement.
Too Many Sources, Not Enough Accuracy
If you were to ask a contact centre manager about the biggest challenge they have, it would be the amount of time it takes for them to pull reports together to create a current view of their operations.
When trying to pull in information on payroll, training, CRM, HR, quality, telephony and incentive programs, they have to draw from various systems and programs, each with its own spreadsheet.
It becomes so time consuming to export all that data from so many disparate sources to create one workable spreadsheet.
Consolidating data from many sources is not only time consuming but also creates opportunities for errors, which can be counterproductive to managers when trying to make important decisions.
Contact centre managers have many challenges; trying to consolidate data shouldn’t be one of them.
Spreadsheets Are Easier to Use, Right?
Some contact centre managers stick to spreadsheets because they think it’s a tried-and-true method that’s worked for a long time.
Plus, they think that using spreadsheets is a cheaper method than investing in technology and they want to keep the bottom line looking good.
Well, just because you’ve used something for a long time doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best approach.
Improvements in capturing data have come a long way and new efficiencies make workers more productive, which means more revenue for your business.
A simple change such as moving away from dated spreadsheets could change the holistic view of your business for the better.
If It’s Not Real-Time, It’s Not Real
Spreadsheets might be fine for inputting some raw data for a quick look at employee overviews but they simply don’t provide enough versatility for any in-depth review.
Static information contained in a spreadsheet isn’t much help when employees need to see what’s happening in real time in order to make valid adjustments for a customer.
Real-time data will help engage employees so that they can improve and course-correct while there’s still time to make a positive impact for the business.
Computerised spreadsheets follow the format of paper-based spreadsheets that have been used in accounting departments for years.
They utilise built-in calculators to alter content with formulas, but data is still held in a rigid layout with no flexibility.
Excel formulas can be challenging to create and formulas can break when adding a question which would move spreadsheets cells around.
Quite simply, simple spreadsheets don’t have the dynamic quality necessary to be able to work proactively and efficiently in contact centre applications.
Just Can’t Get Things to Connect Properly
When using a static spreadsheet, it’s impossible to connect data without manual intervention. And when you have multiple sheets feeding into one another, things can get confusing really fast.
When business needs change, this adds even more flux into the mix.
For example, call history can’t be automatically incorporated to see a forecast—that requires manual operation. This takes up valuable time and increases the chances of inaccurate projections.
Contact centre managers are left with the feeling that they just can’t get things to connect like they should.
It’s Hard to Staff Properly Using Spreadsheets
Managing contact centre employees is also challenging when relying on spreadsheets.
It’s difficult to identify employee skill sets, which could leave an imbalance in skill requirements and lead to over- or under-staffing.
It’s also difficult to adhere to schedules and tracking via a spreadsheet, limiting contact centre managers to spot checking, again leading to improper staffing and inadequate support of the business.
Managing contact centre workers hinges on exceptions a lot of the time and spreadsheets don’t have the dynamic nature necessary to make adjustments properly.
The bottom line is that contact centre manager time is more valuable than manually altering spreadsheets all day, especially when there are more efficient solutions.
No Security for the Long Term
Spreadsheets are not easily stored and users run the risk of them getting lost over time.
This is not only inconvenient when trying to recall data but makes legacy reporting a serious challenge because historical information isn’t available when it’s needed.
A spreadsheet may be effective when looking at a snapshot of a moment in time.
But what happens next month? Does a contact centre manager have to copy and paste the sheet and delete the data? Or delete/add columns for old/new advisors? Has the scorecard changed? And what about showing the performance of a contact centre advisor over the last year?
Many would be able to retrieve the information but it would take a considerable amount of time.
The very nature of contact centre quality assurance is vital and active. Advisors engage with prospects and customers in productive dialogues meant to benefit the customer as well as the employee.
But when outdated methodologies such as spreadsheets are used to plan, record, recall and project, their limitations are significant.
Your customers deserve better. And so do your employees.
Take a look at your quality analytics scorecard without relying so heavily on spreadsheets, and you’ll be pleasantly surprised by what you discover.
This blog post has been re-published by kind permission of Scorebuddy– View the original post